Fighting the War on Error

"You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists."
- Political & Social Activist Abbie Hoffman (1936-1989)

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Mac & Gordon Dipshiddy: perfect together


I'm not normally inclined to watch Letterman, Leno or any of the other late night talk shows, but just as I was going to bed the other night, I caught the tail end of McCain's appearance on Letterman, where he went on to kiss and make up with Dave for canceling last minute a few weeks ago.

It was a pretty predictable appearance, but toward the end of the interview, no matter how hard McCain tried to keep the interview light and superficial, Letterman kept up with the probing questions. Finally, toward the end of the interview, Letterman asked him about his relationship with Gordon Liddy. Watch the end of the video above for McCain's hemming and hawing about him.

[Fade to commercial]

When the show returns from commercial, after McCain had time to think about his response about Liddy further, McCain defiantly (stupidly?) said that he was "proud of his association with Gordon Liddy."

More from Media Matters:
And in an August 22 blog post about an anti-Obama ad highlighting Obama's association with Ayers, (Chicago Tribune reporter Steve) Chapman wrote:
But conservatives may not want to draw attention to the issue of ties to violent radicals -- since John McCain is longtime pals with convicted Watergate burglar Gordon Liddy, who once plotted a journalist's murder (which was never carried out) and has advocated the shooting of federal law enforcement agents.
More from Crooks & Liars:
Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain's campaigns since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008. In addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy's radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video labeled "John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07" includes a discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an "old friend." During the segment, McCain praised Liddy's "adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great," said he was "proud" of Liddy, and said that "it's always a pleasure for me to come on your program."

Additionally, in 1998, Liddy reportedly held a fundraiser at his home for McCain. Liddy was reportedly scheduled to speak at another fundraiser for McCain in 2000. The Charlotte Observer reported on January 23, 2000, that McCain's campaign vouched for Liddy's "character."
Oops!! One would think that before McCain got all sanctimonious over Ayers, he would have looked in the mirror and taken stock in his relationship with Gordon Liddy, and for that matter, his running mate's association with the Alaska Secessionist Movement.

Don't get me wrong - I'm beyond sick of all these guilt by association stories in the media, but the only reason I'm mentioning it is undoubtedly the same reason Letterman did the other night - McCain's past isn't nearly as clean as the mainstream media would have you believe. Of course, on Friday, when the corporate media reported on McCain's Letterman appearance, there was no mention of Liddy, anywhere.

As I wrote last week before the final debate, it's not a stretch to say that Liddy was a domestic terrorist under the Nixon administration. And if Liddy would have been turned loose to do everything he wanted to do under Nixon, he would have been much worse. Some of his ideas included firebombing the Brookings Institution (a left-wing think tank) using Cubans as firemen, kidnapping anti-war protesters during the 1972 Republican National Convention, and luring Democratic Party leaders to a houseboat to take pictures of them in compromising positions with hookers. Oh yea, and there was something called Watergate, too.

It's pretty safe to say that just about any national politician running for the presidency has had a few questionable associations in the past, to secure campaign contributions or a host of other reasons, and that these associations doesn't exactly paint a flattering picture. This is just another example of how McCain has run a dishonorable and dishonest campaign.

Anyway, I was only half paying attention to McCain and Letterman right before I fell asleep, but when I heard Letterman mention Liddy, I almost jumped out of my chair, because no one else in the media has had the temerity to question the Maverick about some of his past associations.

I have much more to say about Bill Ayers, but that's a separate post.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, March 21, 2008

Letterman's take on McCain's Iraq trip


This one was pretty good - a little sketch on David Letterman. I certainly don't discriminate about age, but I do wonder if McCain's age is going to be an issue in this campaign. It's a fair question - he's had cancer in the past, and if he wins in November, he'll be the oldest elected president ever.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Barack does Letterman

It was good to see Barack Obama on David Letterman last night. I thought it was a pretty good appearance. For me, the highlight was when Letterman asked Obama about a possible Clinton/Obama ticket. He responded, "You don't run for second place," and he's right.

Letterman presses him and asks him about a ticket with the both of them, and Obama asks, "What order are we talking about here?" I like it that he keeps his sense of humor, even in the face of questions he may not want to answer. Hillary Clinton would never take the Veep slot, though.

No matter who wins the Democratic nomination, if it's not Obama, I think he will be on the ticket in some way - he's still very young, and he's a little inexperienced. However, I don't believe his inexperience is any reason to not vote for him. Bush Jr. had virtually no experience, save for his 5+ years as Texas governor, an office he won because of his father's buddies.

President Kennedy had very little experience, too. It's about who you surround yourself that counts just as much as the qualifications of a candidate. In the end, that goes back to the candidate, too; if a candidate has sound judgment, he or she will select a presidential cabinet wisely.

Obama would make a fine president.

Here are the Letterman clips.

Part I...



And Part II...

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, March 01, 2007

McCain declares, Joe Biden style...



...with a major gaffe.

Last night, Judas John McCain appeared on David Letterman to basically announce that he is going to announce that he is running for president in 2008. No real surprise there.

What WAS a surprise is when he mentioned that "we've wasted a lot of our most precious treasure over there [in Iraq], which is American lives.

I wonder how the neocon talking head morons will spin this one? Michelle Malkin comes to mind first, considering her diatribe on Barack Obama after he made a similar remark last month.

Every candidate for president is going to have gaffes along the way, and Judas John is no exception. I'm not going to crucify him for that, but in the overall context of McCain's recent position changes is quite amazing. If it's not obvious to you that this man will say or do anything to be elected president, it soon will be. McCain switches positions more than Jenna Jameson.

Anyway, what irks me more than anything is the coverage that McCain's announcement on Letterman received the next morning. Some major media outlets didn't even mention McCain's gaffe in stories about his announcement. What's that all about?

The proof is in the pudding. I went to these Websites and read the stories firsthand. Take a read. Bear with me, I know there's a lot here, but it's worth reading...

From the March 1 edition of The New York Times:


In Newly Usual Way, McCain Says He’ll Run
By ADAM NAGOURNEY

Senator John McCain of Arizona took the platform of a late-night talk show Wednesday and said he would formally announce his campaign for the presidency in early April. His remarks erased entirely whatever doubt could have existed about his ambitions for the Republican nomination.

"The last time we were on this program — I’m sure you remember everything very clearly that we say — but you asked me if I would come back on this show if I was going to announce," Mr. McCain told David Letterman. "I am announcing that I will be a candidate for president of the United States."

"Oh," Mr. Letterman replied with what seemed at least a glimmer of surprise.

Mr. McCain is known as something of a free spirit, and his aides suggested that his remarks to Mr. Letterman were, if formal-sounding, extemporaneous rather than a result of careful planning by his campaign. Nonetheless, aides said, his appearance clearly fit into the campaign’s effort to stir as much excitement and interest as possible in his plans — a point Mr. McCain himself made as he and Mr. Letterman bantered on.

"By the way, I’ll be making a formal announcement in April," Mr. McCain said. By way of explanation, he added: "This is the announcement preceding the formal announcement. You know you drag this out as long as you can. You don’t just have one rendition. You’ve got to do it over and over."

Acting a bit downcast, Mr. Letterman responded, "How do you think that makes me feel?"

The exchange was the latest example of how the customs of presidential campaigns are changing. Not all that long ago, an announcement was a defining moment in the evolution of candidates, in which they truly opened their campaigns. For 2008, on the other hand, candidates have been not only announcing but also pre-announcing on Web sites and various television shows and in random interviews.

In truth, Mr. McCain has been running for the White House for nearly two years and, ever since forming a presidential exploratory committee in November, has repeatedly told interviewers that there are no circumstances he can foresee in which he would not run.

He has assembled a full campaign staff, and his organization has been churning out nearly daily pronouncements of the latest political figure to endorse him. In Iowa two weeks ago, he talked at three events about what he would do as president. And he is going to the West Coast this weekend to raise money.

Mr. McCain’s aides said Wednesday that they would not disclose any details about the announcement tour until later, no doubt in anticipation of drawing yet another round of publicity. "Details on the formal announcement will be forthcoming," said Brian Jones, campaign spokesman.

From the March 1 edition of The Washington Post:

McCain Says He'll Seek Presidency, Plans to Make It Official in April

By Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 1, 2007; A01

Sen. John McCain of Arizona declared last night that he will join the 2008 race for the White House and will formally announce his candidacy in April.

McCain used an appearance on CBS's "Late Show With David Letterman" to say what has been clear for many months, erasing whatever doubts may have existed that he intends to battle for the Republican nomination, which eluded him in 2000.

"I am announcing that I will be a candidate for president of the United States," the former Navy pilot and Vietnam War prisoner told Letterman.

McCain's decision to use the program to declare his intentions followed a pattern increasingly common in this presidential contest, as candidates have used multi-step announcement schedules to garner maximum attention for their bids.

In this case, however, McCain, 70, may have additional motives for using the late-night comedian's show, as he tries to rekindle some of the spontaneity and unpredictability from his first campaign. He cast himself as an insurgent politician in 2000, but this time, weighed down by a supportive position on the Iraq war that is out of step with the public even as he methodically woos the GOP establishment, he has struggled to project the buoyant personality of his first effort.

McCain lost a bitter contest for the Republican nomination to George W. Bush in 2000. But he emerged as the early leader in the race for the 2008 GOP nod, in part because of his support for the president's leadership on the Iraq war but also because he has spent months courting Bush loyalists and the Republican establishment that had spurned him.

In recent months, however, his star has been eclipsed somewhat by that of former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, who now leads McCain in many national and some state polls testing the Republican field. A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Tuesday showed Giuliani leading McCain 44 percent to 21 percent. A month ago, Giuliani's advantage was much narrower, at 34 percent to 27 percent for McCain.

McCain advisers said the decision to declare that he will join the Republican race was not a direct result of concern that Giuliani has gained ground in the past two months but rather part of a long-planned strategy to make his intentions known around this time.

McCain is one of the leading congressional advocates for Bush's troop increase in Iraq, a position that has tied his presidential aspirations to progress in the conflict there. McCain has been highly critical of the administration's management of the war, describing what has taken place over the past few years as a "train wreck" and calling Donald H. Rumsfeld "one of the worst secretaries of defense in history."

In addition to McCain and Giuliani, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney is seen as a potentially strong candidate for the GOP nomination. The McCain and Romney camps have been circling each other for months, attempting to corral activists and major fundraisers both nationally and in states with early contests next year.

Other Republicans already in the race or contemplating running include former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, former Wisconsin governor Tommy G. Thompson, former Virginia governor James Gilmore and Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado.

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) may also join the race, although he appears likely to wait until at least late summer before deciding.

McCain was one of the first Republicans to establish a presidential exploratory committee, filing papers with the Federal Election Commission weeks after the GOP drubbing in the midterm elections last November. At that time, McCain also filed a statement of candidacy, in essence a declaration of his intentions to run.

He recently made his first trip to Iowa as a prospective candidate and made clear that he would run hard for the Republican nomination.

The 2000 race was hard-fought and highly negative. Bush entered as the dominant front-runner, while McCain, who had often parted company with the GOP, was seen as a dark horse.

McCain chose to skip the Iowa caucuses that year and concentrate on New Hampshire, where independents play a more significant role in the process. His maverick style and "Straight Talk Express" theme caught fire and he soundly defeated Bush in the nation's first primary.

That set up what turned into a nasty clash in South Carolina, where McCain was the subject of scurrilous attacks. His advisers blamed the Bush camp for the attacks, but Bush advisers said they were not responsible. Bush won the primary and McCain and his team emerged angry and bitter.

McCain would later find himself in conflict with religious conservatives after he delivered a speech sharply critical of the influence of Rev. Jerry Falwell and the Rev. Pat Robertson, among others, describing them as "agents of intolerance."

Those kinds of remarks have soured some conservatives on McCain as a potential party standard-bearer. Some doubt his commitment to social issues, despite a long record opposing abortion rights, and others believe he has not been a strong advocate for supply-side tax cuts, which have been at the heart of GOP economic philosophy since the administration of President Ronald Reagan.

Some Republicans who opposed McCain in the past have warmed to the prospect of his candidacy, in part because they see him as a potentially strong candidate. But those moves to court conservatives have cost some support among independent voters, and the issue of the war has further complicated McCain's ability to project himself as a nominee who could attract Democrats and left-leaning independents.
And finally, from The Los Angeles Times:

California titans join McCain's campaign team

Although the GOP senator hasn't officially joined the presidential race, he tells David Letterman he is in

By Dan Morain, Times Staff Writer
March 1, 2007

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) unveiled a presidential campaign finance committee Wednesday dominated by Californians and New Yorkers, including some of the biggest donors to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and President Bush.

McCain's 13 national finance committee co-chairmen include five Californians: Orange County billionaire Donald Bren; investor George Argyros; Univision Chairman A. Jerrold Perenchio; Cisco Systems Chief Executive John Chambers; and San Francisco venture capitalist J. Gary Shansby.

Altogether, McCain named 70 Californians, 68 of them men, to his finance team. They will be expected to raise $100,000 or more for the campaign.

"I'd be very disappointed if I didn't raise over $2 million," said Shansby, former chairman of Shaklee Corp., who helps run an investment fund.

The California list includes executives in the entertainment, investment, banking, telecommunications, real estate, gambling and alcohol industries, and current and retired politicians.

Other co-chairmen include New York Stock Exchange Chairman John A. Thain; JP Morgan Vice Chairman James B. Lee; New Jersey banker Lawrence E. Bathgate; GOP fundraiser Lewis M. Eisenberg of New York; and former New Jersey Rep. James A. Courter, chairman of the telecommunications firm IDT Corp.

Though McCain hasn't officially announced his candidacy, he said in a taping of the "Late Show With David Letterman" on Wednesday that he was running and would "announce" it in April.

The release of his finance committee is aimed at showing other candidates the depth of his support and convincing donors that he is the front-runner.

Perenchio is one of at least eight Californians on McCain's list identified as a Bush "pioneer," meaning he raised in excess of $100,000 for the president's campaigns.

Perenchio is Schwarzenegger's largest single donor, at $4.8 million. McCain also tapped Schwarzenegger's lead fundraiser, Marty Wilson, as part of his California
finance committee.

Argyros, Bush's first ambassador to Spain, has spent more than $960,000 on federal campaigns since 1997, including $200,000 on Bush's 2005 inaugural.

Chambers has given more than $1 million to federal campaigns since 1997, and his company has accounted for $1.6 million during the last four years.

Bren and his wife, Brigitte, have given $267,000 to federal campaigns since 2003. Bren's Irvine Co. has accounted for $250,000 to Schwarzenegger.

Shansby has been a relatively small federal donor in the last decade, giving $35,000, Federal Election Commission records show. But as managing director and chairman of TSG Consumer Partners, a San Francisco-based fund that invests in consumer products, he has the potential to raise significant sums.
Damn liberal media!

Absolutely absurd and inexcusable that three of the leading papers in the country would fail to report McCain's gaffe. And a deadline is no alibi here; there is plenty in each story on McCain about not only his announcement, but quotes from the "I'm announcing that I'll announce" candidate.

A special shout out has to go to Media Matters - an organization that does a fantastic job of monitoring stories just like these.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Letterman vs. O'Reilly, Part II



Bill O'Lielly was on David Letterman earlier this year (I think, or late last year), and the two went round and round, about Cindy Sheehan (more on her in a post later today), the War in Iraq, President Bush, etc., and it was pretty entertaining.

Naturally, I was pretty happy to hear that there would be a Round 2. Well, it didn't disappoint. To be fair, O'Lielly got in his licks, too, and brought up a few good points, but I'd give this one to Letterman in a split decision - it was no knock-out, though. Bill's a good debater, and he knows how to handle Letterman; it's obvious O'Lielly was well prepared. But, Letterman stood his ground and isn't intimidated, and that's no small feat against a brow beater like Bill. O'Lielly is a lot like President Bush - guys I'd very much like to like, but I just can't because of their ideology.

But, in the end, these two guys engaged in spirited but largely civil political discourse, and it seems like that's in short supply these days. Well done, men.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Had to finish with a laugh



Lots of angry political stuff tonight, I know, with more to come, but I had to finish the night off with a good laugh. This clip appeared on Letterman not long ago, and when I saw it on YouTube, I cracked up. Enjoy!

Labels: